Which two primary fireground strategies are commonly employed by airport firefighters?

The choice of direct attack and transitional attack as the primary fireground strategies for airport firefighters is aligned with best practices for managing aircraft fires and other emergencies at airports.

A direct attack involves applying extinguishing agents directly to the fire in order to suppress it as quickly as possible. This method is crucial in airport firefighting scenarios where rapid containment is necessary to protect lives, property, and ensure aircraft safety. Direct attacks can effectively reduce the heat release rate and are ideal for confronting fires that are small to moderate and can be accessed safely.

Transitional attack, on the other hand, is a strategy used to first cool a fire from a safe distance before moving in for a direct attack. This method is particularly beneficial in aviation firefighting because it helps control the fire's spread and reduces the intensity of burning materials. This is often done using agents such as foam or water mist, providing firefighters with time to evaluate the situation and develop a safer approach for a more direct assault on the fire.

The combination of these two strategies allows airport firefighters to adapt to the dynamic nature of fire incidents, ensuring both effectiveness in firefighting and safety for the personnel involved. The other options, while they present different fire strategies, do not necessarily reflect the most effective or commonly employed methods